It's really Wil's league so I think he should decide what we end up doing.But in the end, that is the way I see it too...............
I have no problem with wil making the call and I'll go on record as saying I agree with Sam as I defenitly like option 4 as well - bottom two go down top two come up. This way us guys have to earn our keep in the big league and it keeps people in our league from giving up once they realize a play off spot is no longer an option. (Not saying anyone would let up but this would insure a fight till the very end) and second the new guys get to proove their worth and fight for something cool a spot in the bigs. The only drawback I see and it is minor is it may be tough to get 12 guys who are willing to start at the bottom though so in the event we don't get 12 or at least 10 we'd have to have an emergency back plan in place for the guys that want in. But I think that's the way to goWell if we do start a second 12 teamer "B" then all the new owners start in "B" would be my vote and in year 3 top 6 in the "B" go up and bottom 6 in "A" go down..................IMO from all of the guys that have been asking to get in there won't be a problem getting another 12 teamer. Don't think any of the potential new owners would have a problem with that.
Parcells did them no favors. If they could have kept Jimmy Johnson longer they might still have some talent.I agree scape with the Parcells statment. I was just talking to a buddy at work today about him. There is no doubt he did a great job while with the NY teams but I know when he got to Miami he was resting on his accomplishments. I mean we could have had Jamaal Charles who I loved at the time in the third round.
Royal (for $1)That my friend was a sneaky sneaky good move!