I thought that 85 was the "hardcap" and that a school can sign over 25 as long as it doesn't put a school over the 85 limit?
Could we in fact be down to 65, even 60 by year three? If that's the case, it would take at least to 2020 to recover the full 85 roster limit!
Do I have this right?
The NFL in conjunction with the NCAA could ban any agent that violates NCAA rules, That, to me, is simpler, faster and sends a message of "no more". The message sent to these guys by the NCAA now is "don't worry about it, you go scott free, we'll punish the school and the kids for your actions.I vote both but nobody is exactly knocking on my door with a ballet either.
I wouldn't worry. It won't be long before Kiffin gets USC in even more hot water.
I'm kind of irritated with myself for not getting the full ramifications of these sanctions before now.You really have to live it to truly understand the ramifications; you are typically scared the first year then its like this isn't so bad we will be fine. Then year 3 hits and you see the number of seniors on your squad and see the freshmen and sophmores stuggling on the field and then it starts sinking it. Again I hate the whole deal and wish you guys the best the bright side is you are USC and you will recover as quickly as anyone in the country could.
Forgive me if I'm wrong but hasn't Kiffin shown a lack of understanding of the rules wherever he's been. Don't the places he's left have an awful lot of bad things to say about him?
It's like the guy who's been married 5 times and says all his wives were impossible to live with. Sometimes it's you. Well, It looks like the problem has been Kiffin.
I'm sorry I thought this was the PAC12 thread, not the kiss USC's ass thread.