here's an exercise for you, dear reader. The very next time you see the ATT commercial with the adult guy dressed in a suit asking the young children in a classroom about internet speed and more choice and whateves,
then imagine a gunman walikng in and blowing those kids to smithereens. blood and guts lying evrywhere, anguished faces of the little tykes and what have you ...
And here you are, responding to infantile posts. Ntm, avoiding the questions. If you are afraid to answer them, just say so and move on. if you have a non emotional argument to make, make it already, You are the one who was defending the NRA after Sandy Hook before the NRA even did it for themselves.Does that you admit i won?Is this even a coherent sentence?
And, does this response make you feel better about endorsing policies which leave 30 dead in a Connecticut classroom?Only if you need more fallacious tactics like strawman arguments such as this to try to "win" on the internet.
How's that for argumentum ad passiones?It's about right on par from what I've seen of your infantile reasoning.
And here you are, responding to infantile posts.Well, at least you can admit that your posts are infantile and admitting the problem is the first step to recovery.
Ntm, avoiding the questions. If you are afraid to answer them, just say so and move on.Your questions cannot be answered because they're based on logical fallacies and have no bearing whatsoever on rational conversation.
if you have a non emotional argument to make, make it already,Pretty hypocritical coming from a guy that uses Appeals to Emotion as the basis for an argument.
You are the one who was defending the NRA after Sandy Hook before the NRA even did it for themselves.I defended the NRA? By all means, put up some examples of me defending the NRA after the Sandy Hook incident.
the NRA master plan is to redefine crimes like rape and child molestation as misdemeanors, so all these felons aren't denied "their 2nd amendment rights," work as untiring lobbyists for gun manufacturers to ensure that they make the most money possible so that they can continue to contribute chitloads of money to the NRA.do posts like this one make you feel better about your suppoort of NRA policies ?? Help you not think of the suffering and pain you and those who think like you do have inflicted upon our society ? Clinging to your guns, in order to make sure another youngster can be shot to death and bleed out in the street ??
do posts like this one make you feel better about your suppoort of NRA policies ?? Help you not think of the suffering and pain you and those who think like you do have inflicted upon our society ? Clinging to your guns, in order to make sure another youngster can be shot to death and bleed out in the street ??Oh look, more Appeals to Emotion. Based on a strawman argument no less.
Maybe you can point out where I have supported the NRA in any way whatsoever. Especially seeing as my last post (i.e. "the correction") was a sarcastic dig at the NRA as the money grubby group looking out for their own self interests that they are.i get all that, understood and good on you for that.
Of course the last time I asked you to provide such you took your ball and went home using "moving on..." as your exit stage left strategy.you'll have to excuse me for ;iving a life outside of CBS Sportsline, which included a 15 mi bike ride, laundry, and cooking, and other manly exploits.
i get all that, understood and good on you for that.Nice deflection from actually having to admit that you were wrong.
you'll have to excuse me for ;iving a life outside of CBS Sportsline, which included a 15 mi bike ride, laundry, and cooking, and other manly exploits.So your excuse (and a piss poor one at that) for running away instead of backing up your claims is that you had other stuff to do? Excuse me while I lol.
Anyways, the main point is that you support what they support, so by that logic , you support them.What fact is that? You cannot even tell me what they support that I also support. All you can do is keep repeating yourself in the hopes that eventually you might be right, for a change.
Sematic it away all you want, but that fact remains.
In the end, you do not believe in drastic changes away from the second amendment. The mass killings which happen in every corner of this nation day in and day out are not enough for you to want to overhaul the way we perceive private gun ownership in our nation.Anyways, the main point is that you support what they support, so by that logic , you support them.What fact is that? You cannot even tell me what they support that I also support. All you can do is keep repeating yourself in the hopes that eventually you might be right, for a change.
Sematic it away all you want, but that fact remains.
In the end, you do not believe in drastic changes away from the second amendment. The mass killings which happen in every corner of this nation day in and day out are not enough for you to want to overhaul the way we perceive private gun ownership in our nation.You might want to swing by your local GNC and pick up some Ginseng or some Ginkgo Biloba then because your memory is faulty as hell. That is not my position at all. Although I do support the 2nd Amendment I am all for strict regulation of gun ownership and have argued as such countless times.
I don't need to waste time trying to dig out a specific post, so I am trying ro summarize your position based on memory.
If it differs, say so, without the juvenile insults please.Oh please. Don't try to act all high and mighty now lol.
Better yet - what makes you think that a man who will never run for office again in his lifeProof he will declare marshall law!!!